WorkflowGen Alternatives: Top Competitors for Modern Workflow Automation

Key takeaways
- WorkflowGen is a BPM software used for process automation, but its complexity and higher costs push many businesses to explore alternatives.
- The best WorkflowGen alternatives balance usability, scalability, integration capabilities, and affordability.
- Tools like Cflow, Kissflow, ProcessMaker, Nintex, Appian, Zoho Creator, Bizagi, Bonita, Pipefy, and Joget stand out as strong competitors.
- Choosing the right WorkflowGen alternative requires assessing team expertise, business goals, integration needs, and pricing models.
WorkflowGen is a workflow management and BPM tool designed to automate business processes through forms, rules, and API-based integrations. It offers flexibility and control, especially for IT-driven environments. However, its steep learning curve, developer-heavy setup, and higher costs make it less suitable for organizations that want quick and user-friendly automation.
Gartner projects that 70% of new business applications will use no-code/low-code technologies by 2025, up from less than 25% in 2020. As businesses increasingly prioritize no-code and low-code solutions, many are searching for WorkflowGen alternatives that empower non-technical users to automate processes with ease. In this blog, we’ll explore why companies move away from WorkflowGen, what to look for in an alternative, the top competitors available today, and why Cflow stands out as the smarter choice.
Table of Contents
Why Businesses Look for WorkflowGen Alternatives
WorkflowGen has been a reliable BPM solution for organizations that need form-based process automation and IT-driven workflows. While it delivers flexibility and strong API integrations, many businesses find that it no longer aligns with their evolving needs. The shift toward faster, simpler, and more cost-effective automation platforms has pushed companies to explore alternatives. Below are the main reasons why organizations look beyond WorkflowGen.
Complexity for Non-Technical Users
WorkflowGen is designed with IT and developer teams in mind. Creating or modifying workflows often requires technical expertise, which makes it less accessible for business users. For example, if an HR manager wants to tweak an employee onboarding process, they would likely need IT support. This dependency slows down agility and frustrates non-technical teams.
High Total Cost of Ownership
While WorkflowGen may appear cost-effective initially, the overall expenses can be high. Licensing fees, infrastructure requirements, developer resources, and training costs add up quickly. Smaller businesses or those with limited budgets often find it challenging to justify these recurring costs when no-code alternatives offer more value at a fraction of the price.
Longer Deployment Cycles
Rolling out workflows in WorkflowGen can take considerable time, especially when processes require custom coding and testing. Businesses with fast-moving operations, like e-commerce or startups, cannot afford long implementation timelines. They prefer platforms like Cflow or Pipefy that allow processes to go live in hours instead of weeks.
Limited No-Code Flexibility
Modern organizations expect employees across departments to contribute to digital transformation. WorkflowGen, however, is not built for democratized workflow automation. Its limited no-code features mean that business teams remain dependent on IT. In contrast, tools like Cflow provide intuitive drag-and-drop builders, empowering everyone to automate processes independently.
Integration Barriers With Modern Cloud Tools
Although WorkflowGen supports APIs, connecting it with widely used cloud applications often requires technical work. For example, integrating WorkflowGen with tools like Slack, Salesforce, or Google Workspace usually involves IT intervention. Businesses increasingly prefer alternatives that offer plug-and-play integrations, saving time and effort.
Scalability Concerns for Growing Businesses
WorkflowGen can handle enterprise workloads, but it isn’t always the most flexible option for scaling across multiple departments. A mid-sized company may begin by automating procurement but later wants to expand into HR, finance, and customer service. No-code cloud-native platforms make scaling smoother without heavy reconfiguration or added complexity.
Shifting Market Trends Toward No-Code and Low-Code
Recent research shows that a majority of new business applications can be built using low-code or no-code technologies, which reiterates the importance of shifting from code-intensive workflow automation. Businesses are moving away from traditional BPM platforms that require coding, toward more agile and accessible solutions. WorkflowGen, being more IT-centric, is less aligned with this trend.
Example Scenario
Consider a healthcare provider that wants to digitize patient intake and compliance workflows. With WorkflowGen, the IT team must design the forms, set the logic, and test integrations, taking weeks. With a no-code alternative like Cflow, the compliance team can design and deploy the same workflow within days, reducing IT dependency and speeding up compliance checks.
Businesses look for WorkflowGen alternatives because they want faster deployment, reduced costs, and solutions that empower all users, not just IT. As companies embrace democratized automation and no-code platforms, alternatives like Cflow, Kissflow, and Zoho Creator emerge as smarter, more accessible, and scalable options.
What to Look for in a WorkflowGen Alternative?
Choosing the right WorkflowGen alternative is about more than simply switching tools, it’s about ensuring the new platform aligns with your business goals, technical capabilities, and growth plans. Since WorkflowGen is often seen as complex and IT-centric, the right replacement should provide greater accessibility, faster deployment, and cost efficiency. Below are the most important factors to consider when evaluating WorkflowGen alternatives.
Ease of Use for All Teams
One of WorkflowGen’s drawbacks is its steep learning curve for non-technical users. A modern alternative should have an intuitive drag-and-drop builder that empowers business users to design, launch, and modify workflows on their own. For example, an HR team should be able to update an employee onboarding process without waiting for IT support.
No-Code or Low-Code Flexibility
Look for platforms that democratize workflow automation. No-code solutions like Cflow or Pipefy allow teams to create workflows visually, while low-code platforms like Appian or Bizagi provide extra flexibility for organizations with some IT resources. The right tool should match your team’s technical skillset while still enabling agility.
Customization and Adaptability
Every organization has unique processes, and a one-size-fits-all approach rarely works. The ideal WorkflowGen alternative should allow you to customize forms, set conditional logic, and build approval hierarchies without coding. For instance, a finance department should be able to tweak its expense reimbursement workflow instantly if policy changes occur.
Scalability for Business Growth
Startups and SMBs often begin with simple workflows like leave requests or vendor approvals. But as they grow, they’ll want to automate more complex, cross-departmental processes. A suitable alternative should scale seamlessly, from a handful of workflows to enterprise-wide automation, without requiring significant reconfiguration or infrastructure changes.
Integration Capabilities
Today’s businesses rely on multiple tools, from CRMs like Salesforce to collaboration platforms like Slack. The alternative should integrate easily with your existing ecosystem. Plug-and-play integrations reduce IT workload and ensure smooth data flow between systems. For example, approvals triggered in Slack or data synced automatically with Google Sheets can save hours of manual work.
Cost and Pricing Transparency
WorkflowGen’s total cost of ownership can be high due to licensing, developer requirements, and infrastructure. When evaluating alternatives, look for subscription models that clearly define costs without hidden fees. No-code platforms like Cflow offer transparent, affordable plans that make enterprise-grade automation accessible even to smaller businesses.
User Experience and Adoption
The success of any automation tool depends on how quickly employees adopt it. Platforms with clean interfaces, prebuilt templates, and mobile accessibility encourage faster adoption across departments. A user-friendly tool also reduces the need for extensive training. For example, a customer support team can automate ticket escalation in minutes with a visual builder, boosting productivity.
Security and Compliance
Data protection is critical for industries like healthcare, finance, and legal services. The right WorkflowGen alternative should include enterprise-grade security features like role-based access, audit logs, and data encryption. Compliance support for regulations like GDPR or HIPAA is also essential for businesses in regulated industries.
Support and Training Resources
Strong vendor support can make or break your experience. Look for alternatives that offer onboarding help, training materials, and responsive customer support. Tools with active communities and extensive documentation also provide valuable peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.
Mobile and Remote Accessibility
With distributed teams becoming the norm, mobile-friendly workflows are essential. Employees should be able to review, approve, and update tasks from any device. Alternatives with dedicated mobile apps or responsive web interfaces ensure that processes don’t stall when teams are on the go.
Example Scenario
Imagine a logistics company evaluating WorkflowGen alternatives. The operations team needs a simple drag-and-drop workflow design, the finance team wants integrations with accounting software, and the compliance team requires audit trails. A no-code tool like Cflow meets all these needs in one platform, making it a better long-term fit than WorkflowGen.
The right WorkflowGen alternative is the one that combines usability, flexibility, and affordability with robust automation features. By prioritizing ease of use, integrations, scalability, and security, businesses can ensure that the new platform not only replaces WorkflowGen but also delivers greater long-term value.
Best WorkflowGen Alternatives and Competitors
Here are 10 strong alternatives to WorkflowGen with features, pros, cons, and user ratings:
1. Cflow
Cflow is a no-code workflow automation platform that makes process management simple and affordable for businesses of all sizes.
Key Features
- Drag-and-drop workflow builder
- Role-based access and data encryption
- Real-time analytics and reports
- 1000+ third-party integrations
Pros
- Extremely user-friendly
- Transparent pricing
- Customizable and scalable
Cons
- Advanced features may need initial exploration
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.8/5
- G2: 4.7/5
2. Kissflow
Kissflow combines workflow automation, case management, and project collaboration.
Key Features
- Workflow templates
- Task tracking and reporting
- Cloud integrations
Pros
- Easy to use
- Good for SMBs
Cons
- Limited advanced automation
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.2/5
- G2: 4.1/5
3. ProcessMaker
ProcessMaker is a BPM-focused platform that helps enterprises design and optimize workflows.
Key Features
- BPMN-based workflow design
- API integrations
- Role-specific dashboards
Pros
- Enterprise-grade features
- Strong BPM capabilities
Cons
- Steep learning curve
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.3/5
- G2: 4.2/5
4. Nintex
Nintex specializes in workflow automation and robotic process automation (RPA).
Key Features
- Workflow and document automation
- Cloud and on-prem deployment
- RPA capabilities
Pros
- Strong integrations
- Enterprise-ready
Cons
- Expensive compared to peers
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.4/5
- G2: 4.2/5
5. Appian
Appian is a low-code automation platform with a focus on enterprise scalability.
Key Features
- Visual workflow modeling
- AI-powered automation
- Case management tools
Pros
- Highly scalable
- Good for large enterprises
Cons
- Costly for SMBs
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.2/5
- G2: 4.3/5
6. Zoho Creator
Zoho Creator enables businesses to build apps and automate workflows without coding.
Key Features
- Drag-and-drop builder
- Workflow templates
- Native Zoho integrations
Pros
- Affordable
- Easy to set up
Cons
- Limited advanced automation
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.3/5
- G2: 4.2/5
7. Bizagi
Bizagi is known for its strong process modeling capabilities and flexible deployment options.
Key Features
- BPMN process modeling
- Case management
- Cloud or on-premise deployment
Pros
- Enterprise-level BPM features
- Flexible deployment
Cons
- Learning curve for non-technical users
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.5/5
- G2: 4.3/5
8. Bonita
Bonita is an open-source BPM platform that combines process modeling with automation flexibility.
Key Features
- BPMN workflow automation
- Low-code tools
- API integration
Pros
- Open-source flexibility
- Strong developer community
Cons
- Requires IT expertise
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.2/5
- G2: 4.0/5
9. Pipefy
Pipefy is a workflow management tool designed for business teams.
Key Features
- Kanban-based workflows
- Workflow templates
- Automation rules
Pros
- User-friendly for SMBs
- Fast onboarding
Cons
- Limited enterprise features
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.6/5
- G2: 4.4/5
10. Joget
Joget is a no-code/low-code platform for workflow automation and app development.
Key Features
- App and workflow builder
- Integration with enterprise systems
- Workflow customization
Pros
- Balance of no-code and low-code
- Flexible customization
Cons
- UI could be more modern
Ratings
- Capterra: 4.3/5
- G2: 4.1/5
Comparison Table: Top 6 WorkflowGen Alternatives
Tool | Ease of Use | Pricing | Best For | Capterra | G2 |
Cflow | Excellent | Affordable | SMBs & Enterprises | 4.8/5 | 4.7/5 |
Kissflow | Good | Mid-range | SMBs | 4.2/5 | 4.1/5 |
ProcessMaker | Moderate | Higher-end | IT-driven enterprises | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
Nintex | Advanced | Expensive | Large enterprises | 4.4/5 | 4.2/5 |
Appian | Advanced | Expensive | Enterprise scalability | 4.2/5 | 4.3/5 |
Zoho Creator | Easy | Budget-friendly | SMBs & startups | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
Cflow Vs WorkflowGen Head-To-Head Comparison
WorkflowGen and Cflow both address the need for workflow automation, but they take very different approaches. WorkflowGen is a developer-focused BPM platform with an emphasis on form-based process automation and API-driven integration. Cflow, in contrast, is a no-code workflow automation solution designed to empower all business users to create and manage workflows without technical barriers. Understanding these differences helps organizations choose the platform that best fits their needs.
Ease of Use
WorkflowGen is powerful but complex. Designing workflows often requires technical expertise, making it less accessible to non-IT users. For instance, HR managers or finance officers typically need IT assistance to make even small changes. Cflow removes this barrier by offering a visual, drag-and-drop workflow builder. Business users can create or modify workflows independently, which accelerates adoption across departments and reduces reliance on IT.
Customization and Flexibility
WorkflowGen provides customization but depends heavily on coding for adjustments. This can make process changes time-consuming and resource-intensive. Cflow, on the other hand, enables deep customization without a single line of code. Teams can build custom forms, add conditional logic, and adjust approval hierarchies instantly, making it easier to align workflows with evolving business needs.
Deployment and Scalability
WorkflowGen is often deployed on-premise or in hybrid IT environments. While this appeals to enterprises with dedicated infrastructure, it adds complexity and maintenance costs. Cflow is a cloud-native SaaS solution, which means it’s easier to deploy, scale, and manage. Businesses can start small with just one or two workflows and expand automation across departments without additional infrastructure or setup overhead.
Cost of Ownership
WorkflowGen may appear cost-effective upfront, but hidden expenses add up quickly. Licensing fees, developer support, infrastructure, and training increase the total cost of ownership. Smaller businesses may find these costs unsustainable. Cflow offers transparent subscription-based pricing that is affordable for SMBs while still providing enterprise-grade automation. This predictable pricing model makes budgeting simpler and ensures ROI.
Integration Capabilities
WorkflowGen provides strong API-based integrations but often requires IT intervention to set them up. For organizations relying on modern cloud apps, this can be time-consuming. Cflow simplifies integration with plug-and-play connectors to over 1,000+ business applications, including Slack, Salesforce, and Google Workspace. This ease of integration reduces IT workload and ensures seamless collaboration.
Target Audience
WorkflowGen is best suited for IT-heavy organizations that want deep control and have the technical expertise to manage a BPM platform. Cflow is designed for everyone—business users, managers, and decision-makers—who want to automate processes quickly without coding. This makes Cflow a better fit for SMBs, startups, and enterprises seeking democratized automation.
Example Scenario
Consider a mid-sized financial services company that wants to automate loan approval workflows. With WorkflowGen, the IT team would need to design forms, configure APIs, and maintain the process. Any changes would require developer input, slowing down agility. With Cflow, the loan operations team can build the entire workflow using a drag-and-drop interface and connect it with existing CRM systems in hours, not weeks.
Verdict
Both WorkflowGen and Cflow serve the same purpose, workflow automation, but their approaches are very different. WorkflowGen leans toward IT-driven, form-based process automation with higher complexity, while Cflow offers simplicity, scalability, and accessibility through no-code automation. For organizations that value speed, affordability, and empowering all employees to participate in digital transformation, Cflow emerges as the smarter and more future-ready choice.
Cflow’s ease of use and affordability make it a smarter choice for organizations seeking flexibility and speed.
End-to-end workflow automation
Build fully-customizable, no code process workflows in a jiffy.
WorkflowGen Alternative Buyer’s Checklist
When evaluating WorkflowGen alternatives, keep this checklist in mind to guide your decision-making process:
1. Prioritize Ease of Use
The platform should empower non-technical users to build and manage workflows without IT intervention. Look for drag-and-drop builders, visual dashboards, and prebuilt templates that reduce the learning curve and accelerate adoption across departments.
2. Look for No-Code or Low-Code Flexibility
Choose a tool that matches your team’s technical expertise. No-code platforms work best for business-led automation, while low-code options provide more customization for organizations with developer resources. Striking the right balance ensures agility without compromising control.
3. Demand Strong Customization Capabilities
Your business processes are unique, and your automation platform should reflect that. Ensure the tool allows customization of forms, rules, notifications, and approval flows. The ability to adapt quickly to policy or regulatory changes is critical for long-term relevance.
4. Check Scalability for Future Growth
Don’t just solve today’s challenges—prepare for tomorrow’s needs. The ideal alternative should scale smoothly from a handful of workflows to enterprise-wide automation. Cloud-native platforms typically offer better scalability without adding infrastructure complexity.
5. Ensure Seamless Integrations
Your automation tool should not operate in isolation. Look for native integrations or easy connectors with your CRM, ERP, HRMS, and collaboration tools. Plug-and-play integrations with apps like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Google Workspace help maintain data consistency and improve cross-functional efficiency.
6. Compare Pricing and Total Cost of Ownership
A platform’s sticker price doesn’t always tell the full story. Consider hidden costs like developer support, infrastructure, and training. Transparent subscription pricing, as offered by tools like Cflow, provides better predictability and ensures your automation strategy is cost-effective.
7. Evaluate Security and Compliance Readiness
For industries with strict regulations, security is non-negotiable. Ensure the tool offers encryption, access controls, audit logs, and compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, or SOC 2. Data integrity and regulatory alignment are essential to avoid risks and penalties.
8. Review Support and Vendor Reliability
Even the most intuitive platforms benefit from strong customer support. Check if the vendor offers onboarding assistance, knowledge bases, and responsive help desks. A provider with a proven track record in customer success ensures a smoother long-term partnership.
9. Test Mobile Accessibility
Remote and hybrid work environments demand mobile-ready solutions. Verify that the platform supports approvals, updates, and notifications on smartphones and tablets, so processes keep moving even outside the office.
10. Take Advantage of Free Trials or Demos
Finally, don’t commit blindly. Most modern platforms offer free trials or demos. Use these opportunities to test usability, integrations, and performance with real workflows. This hands-on experience will reveal if the solution truly meets your expectations.
How to Choose the Right WorkflowGen Alternative
Selecting the right WorkflowGen alternative is a strategic decision that impacts efficiency, costs, and scalability. Since WorkflowGen is often considered complex and resource-intensive, the ideal replacement should align with your organization’s technical capabilities, business priorities, and long-term growth plans. Below are the key considerations for making the right choice.
Assess Your Team’s Technical Expertise
WorkflowGen is built for IT-driven environments, which may not work for organizations with limited technical resources. If your workforce is primarily non-technical, a no-code platform like Cflow or Pipefy will enable them to design and manage workflows independently. On the other hand, if you have a strong IT department and want maximum flexibility, low-code tools like Bizagi or Appian may still be suitable.
Define Your Business Objectives
Before evaluating tools, clarify what you want to achieve with automation. Is the goal to speed up approvals, improve compliance, cut manual errors, or enhance collaboration? For example, if your top priority is reducing the time spent on purchase order approvals, platforms with ready-to-use templates and prebuilt integrations (like Kissflow or Zoho Creator) will deliver faster results.
Match Workflow Complexity to Platform Strengths
Not all processes require the same level of automation. If you’re dealing with highly complex workflows involving multiple decision points and system integrations, an enterprise-grade solution like Nintex or Appian may be justified. But if your needs revolve around straightforward processes like HR onboarding or expense approvals, user-friendly no-code tools like Cflow are more efficient.
Evaluate Scalability for Growth
Your automation platform should not only solve current challenges but also grow with your business. Many companies start small, automating a single process, but later expand to enterprise-wide workflows. Cloud-native tools like Cflow and Zoho Creator make it easier to scale without major reconfiguration or infrastructure costs.
Consider Integration Needs
Automation is only effective if it connects with the systems your teams already use. Look for alternatives with built-in integrations for CRMs (Salesforce, HubSpot), ERPs (SAP, Oracle), or collaboration tools (Slack, Microsoft Teams). Cflow, for example, offers plug-and-play integration with over 1,000+ apps, reducing IT dependency and ensuring smoother data flow across systems.
Compare Pricing Models and Total Cost of Ownership
The real cost of WorkflowGen isn’t just the license—it includes training, infrastructure, and ongoing developer support. When reviewing alternatives, consider subscription-based platforms with transparent pricing and no hidden costs. Affordable solutions like Cflow provide enterprise-grade functionality without burdening smaller businesses with heavy overhead.
Ensure Security and Compliance Features
Security should be a top priority, especially in industries like healthcare, finance, and legal services. The alternative should offer role-based permissions, encryption, audit trails, and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. Nintex and Cflow, for example, provide enterprise-grade compliance features that help businesses stay secure while automating workflows.
Examine User Adoption Potential
A platform is only effective if employees use it. Look for tools with clean, intuitive interfaces, prebuilt templates, and mobile accessibility. This minimizes training requirements and boosts adoption across teams. For instance, a customer support team can quickly automate ticket routing in a no-code platform without extensive onboarding.
Verify Support and Vendor Reliability
Good vendor support can make a significant difference, especially during the transition from WorkflowGen. Evaluate whether the provider offers onboarding assistance, 24/7 support, detailed documentation, and an active community. Strong customer support ensures smoother implementation and long-term success.
Test Through Free Trials or Demos
The most reliable way to determine whether a WorkflowGen alternative fits your business is to try it. Free trials and demos allow teams to experiment with real processes, measure usability, and evaluate ROI before making a financial commitment. For example, you could automate a leave approval workflow in Cflow’s free trial and immediately assess how quickly your team adapts.
Example Scenario
Imagine a mid-sized logistics company deciding between WorkflowGen and its alternatives. The company needs simple drag-and-drop workflow design for its operations team, integrations with accounting software for finance, and audit trails for compliance. A no-code platform like Cflow fulfills all these requirements seamlessly, whereas WorkflowGen would require ongoing IT involvement and higher costs.
The right WorkflowGen alternative is one that reduces complexity while empowering your teams to automate efficiently. By carefully evaluating technical expertise, business goals, scalability, integrations, costs, security, and vendor support, you can select a platform that not only replaces WorkflowGen but also delivers greater agility and long-term value.
Why Cflow is the Smarter Choice
Cflow offers businesses a no-code automation platform that makes workflows accessible across all departments. Unlike WorkflowGen, it doesn’t require IT-heavy setups or coding expertise. Its affordability, scalability, and intuitive design make it the top WorkflowGen alternative for modern organizations.
Cflow has helped many global organizations streamline their operations. From Capex approvals to PO processing to employee onboarding approvals – Cflow has helped organizations improve process efficiency and productivity. No code workflow automation that is powered by AI is what makes Cflow the preferred choice for automating core business workflows. Cflow ticks all the checkboxes as the preferred WorkflowGen alternative.
Cflow Features in Detail
- Visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop functionality
- Customizable forms and approval rules
- Role-based access and secure encryption
- Real-time reports and analytics
- Public forms and OCR capabilities
- Seamless integrations with 1000+ apps
Final Thoughts
WorkflowGen is a capable BPM tool but often too complex and expensive for many organizations. Businesses today prefer platforms that balance automation power with simplicity and affordability. Among all WorkflowGen alternatives, Cflow stands out as the smarter choice for SMBs and enterprises seeking no-code workflow automation. Try Cflow today and experience effortless automation.
FAQs
1. Why do businesses switch from WorkflowGen?
Businesses switch from WorkflowGen due to its complexity, high costs, and limited no-code capabilities, seeking simpler and more affordable alternatives.
2. Which WorkflowGen alternative is best for SMBs?
Cflow and Zoho Creator are excellent for SMBs because they are affordable, scalable, and easy to use.
3. What is the best enterprise-grade WorkflowGen alternative?
Appian and Nintex are strong enterprise alternatives due to their scalability and advanced features.
4. Is Cflow better than WorkflowGen?
Yes, for businesses seeking no-code simplicity, lower costs, and faster deployment, Cflow is a better choice than WorkflowGen.
5. Can WorkflowGen alternatives integrate with other apps?
Yes, most alternatives like Cflow, Kissflow, and Pipefy offer seamless integrations with CRMs, ERPs, and productivity tools.
What should you do next?
Thanks for reading till the end. Here are 3 ways we can help you automate your business:

Do better workflow automation with Cflow
Create workflows with multiple steps, parallel reviewals. auto approvals, public forms, etc. to save time and cost.

Talk to a workflow expert
Get a 30-min. free consultation with our Workflow expert to optimize your daily tasks.

Get smarter with our workflow resources
Explore our workflow automation blogs, ebooks, and other resources to master workflow automation.